We investigated, using simulated studies, the accuracy of i 2 in the assessment of heterogeneity and the effects of heterogeneity on the predictive value of metaanalyses. M quantitatively describes systematic nonrandom heterogeneity patterns acting across multiple variants in a gwas metaanalysis. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a meta analysis. From the within study results, i can see that results from two of the studies are in the same direction while the. This heterogeneity may be of clinical, methodological or statistical origin. These interventions include acupressure, massage, tai chi, qi gong, electroacupuncture and use of chinese herbal medicinesfor example, in enemas, foot. Sep 06, 2003 an alternative quantification of heterogeneity in a metaanalysis is the amongstudy variance often called. It has been increasingly used to obtain more credible results in a wide range of scientific fields. Meta analysis is a quantitative technique that uses specific measures e. For simplicity, we use the term meta analysis in the remainder of the article. This qualitative interview study aimed to understand researchers understanding of complexity and heterogeneity and the factors which may influence the choices researchers.
Introduction after several decades development, metaanalysis has become the pillar of evidencebased medicine. The randomeffects meta analysis attempts to account for this distribution of effects and provides a more conservative estimate of the effect. From the standpoint that heterogeneity is inevitable in a metaanalysis, we are left with the question of whether there is an acceptable degree of heterogeneity. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on. Functions for metaanalysis and methodology soundness. Most metaanalysis programs perform inversevariance metaanalyses.
There is a need for sound methodological guidance on how to. Systematic heterogeneity can arise in a meta analysis due to differences in the study characteristics of participating studies. There are 3 types of heterogeneity commonly considered in metaanalysis. A metaanalysis is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies. Different weights are assigned to the different studies for calculating the summary or pooled effect. For example, when there are many studies in a metaanalysis, one may obtain a tight confidence interval around the randomeffects estimate of the mean effect even when there is a large amount of heterogeneity. Conversely, q has too much power as a test of heterogeneity if the number of studies is large higgins et al. Since then, the statistical methods evolved from simply following the approaches used for intervention metaanalyses to the summary roc sroc model also known as moseslittenberg model which takes in to account the threshold effect, and. Is there any statical software for calculation of heterogenity in a. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a metaanalysis. Quantifying systematic heterogeneity in metaanalysis. Methodological considerations in network metaanalysis. Currently, q and its descendant i2 i square tests are widely used as the tools for heterogeneity evaluation.
Sep 14, 2016 meta analysis has become a popular tool for increasing power in genetic association studies, yet it remains a methodological challenge. It is typically a result of clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity, or both. The core mission of this kind of test is to identify data sets from. However, heterogeneity is still the threat to the validity and quality of such studies. Variance between studies in a metaanalysis will exist. A metaanalysis integrates the quantitative findings from separate but similar studies and provides a numerical estimate of the overall effect of interest petrie et al. Metaanalysis is a statistical method that combines quantitative findings from previous studies. Background infections with multidrug resistant mdr bacteria in hospital settings have substantial implications in terms of clinical and economic outcomes.
Flawed metaanalytic methodology is common in many fields such as oncology. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is. In contrast, a fixedeffect analysis assumes that a single common effect underlies every study included in the metaanalysis. Methodological heterogeneity refers to differences in the way that studies were. In this lecture we look at how to deal with it when we have it. Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a metaanalysis, statistical software components s449201, boston college department of economics, revised 25 jan 2006. Heterogeneity, metaanalysis and metaregression modules facilitate. So, if one brings together different studies for analysing them or doing a meta analysis, it is clear that there will be differences found. Genetic association studies can differ from each other in terms of environmental conditions, study design, population types and sizes, statistical noise, and analytical use of covariates. Dealing with heterogeneity in metaanalyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. Since then, the statistical methods evolved from simply following the approaches used for intervention meta analyses to the summary roc sroc model also known as moseslittenberg model which takes in to account the threshold effect, and then to more advanced.
While there is some consensus on methods for investigating statistical and methodological heterogeneity, little attention has been paid to clinical aspects of heterogeneity. The results for the test of heterogeneity for the meta analysis of fall related injuries are displayed towards the bottom of the forest plot in the line test for heterogeneity. Quantifying systematic heterogeneity in metaanalysis view on github. Assessment of the betweenstudy heterogeneity is an essential component of metaanalysis.
Metadisc also allows exploration of heterogeneity chisquare, cochranq and. Hi all, i am using metal for metaanalysis of some specific snps 6 snps of interest across three studies. Oct 28, 2010 the randomeffects meta analysis attempts to account for this distribution of effects and provides a more conservative estimate of the effect. My own view is that any amount of heterogeneity is acceptable, providing both that the predefined eligibility criteria for the metaanalysis are sound and that the data are correct. These interventions include acupressure, massage, tai chi, qi gong, electroacupuncture and use of chinese herbal medicinesfor example, in enemas, foot massage and compressing the umbilicus. These random effects models and software packages mentioned above.
Significant statistical heterogeneity arising from methodological diversity or differences. Q is included in each statsdirect meta analysis function because it forms part of the dersimonianlaird random effects pooling method dersimonian and laird 1985. An alternative quantification of heterogeneity in a meta analysis is the amongstudy variance often called. Metaanalysis is a quantitative technique that uses specific measures e. Metaanalysis in biological sciences, especially in ecology and evolution which we refer to as biological metaanalysis faces somewhat different methodological problems from its counterparts in medical and social sciences, where metaanalytic.
Third, some scientists argue that the objective coding procedure used in metaanalysis ignores the context of each individual study, such as its methodological rigor. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of. There are methods for assessing and addressing heterogeneity that we discuss in detail in. For example, when there are many studies in a meta analysis, one may obtain a tight confidence interval around the randomeffects estimate of the mean effect even when there is a large amount of heterogeneity. It is the method in which multiple interventions that is, three or more are compared using both direct comparisons of interventions within randomized controlled trials and indirect comparisons. Recommended softwarepackages for metaanalysis of diagnostic. I am doing a meta analysis for my thesis on 3 treatment options in treating achalasia. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses in cochrane consumers and. Methodological standards for metaanalyses and qualitative. The core mission of this kind of test is to identify data sets from similar. Estimates of heterogeneity i can be biased in small. Metaanalysis has become a popular tool for increasing power in genetic association studies, yet it remains a methodological challenge. Also seemeta meta esize for how to compute various effect sizes in a metaanalysis.
It should be noted that the decision to focus on patient diagnoses and comparator duration is an. Another important consideration for metaanalysis is that of the underlying model. In contrast, a fixedeffect analysis assumes that a single common effect underlies every study included in the meta analysis. Its analysis is crucial for defining whether selected primary studies pooling is fit for metaanalysis. It has been almost 30 years since the publication of the first metaanalysis of diagnostic test accuracy dta. Heterogeneity in metaanalysis q, isquare statsdirect. Fourth, when a researcher includes lowquality studies in a metaanalysis, the limitations of these studies impact the mean effect size i.
Metaanalysis in biological sciences, especially in ecology and evolution which we refer to as biological metaanalysis faces somewhat different methodological problems from its counterparts in medical and. From the within study results, i can see that results from two of the studies are in the same direction while the results from the 3rd study is null. Sensitivity of betweenstudy heterogeneity in metaanalysis. First, like primary research studies synthesized in a meta analysis, methods used in a meta analysis should be fully transparent and reproducible. In common with other metaanalysis software, revman presents an estimate of the betweenstudy variance in a randomeffects metaanalysis. So, if one brings together different studies for analysing them or doing a metaanalysis, it is clear that there will be differences found. The historical roots of meta analysis can be traced back to 17th century studies of astronomy, while a paper published in 1904 by the statistician karl pearson in the british medical journal which collated data from several studies of typhoid inoculation is seen as the first time a meta analytic approach was used to aggregate the outcomes of multiple clinical studies. First, like primary research studies synthesized in a metaanalysis, methods used in a metaanalysis should be fully transparent and reproducible. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is not assumed.
However, due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, estimates about the attributable economic and clinical effects of healthcareassociated infections hai due to mdr microorganisms mdr hai remain unclear. This is more useful for comparisons of heterogeneity among subgroups, but values depend on the treatment effect scale. Nov 16, 2016 metaanalysis, complexity, and heterogeneity. For simplicity, we use the term metaanalysis in the remainder of the article. This module should be installed from within stata by typing ssc install heterogi. Because of loss of power, nonsignificant heterogeneity within a subgroup may. The greek root meta means with, along, after, or later, so here we have an. While the metaanalytic methodology is similar for systematic and rapid. Ideally, the studies whose results are being combined in the meta analysis should all be undertaken in the same way and to the same experimental protocols. Q is included in each statsdirect metaanalysis function because it forms part of the dersimonianlaird random effects pooling method dersimonian and laird 1985. Study heterogeneity an overview sciencedirect topics. Metaanalysis seeks to understand heterogeneity in addition to computing a summary risk estimate. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of.
In recent years, a number of new methods have been developed to meet these challenges. Exploring sources of heterogeneity 2 metaregression form of subgroup analysis that allows consideration of continuous variables, e. Openmee was developed to make advanced methods for statistical research synthesis, based on best practices, available without cost to the scientific. Assessment of the betweenstudy heterogeneity is an essential component of meta analysis. The last of these is quantified by the i 2statistic. Methodological and clinical heterogeneity and extraction. The dilemma of heterogeneity tests in metaanalysis. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation. By convention, the null hypothesis is rejected if the chisquare test has p heterogeneity is not something to be afraid of, it just means that there is variability in your data. Network metaanalysis nma is an extension of pairwise metaanalysis that facilitates comparisons of multiple interventions over a single analysis. This article provides an introduction to the metaanalysis literature and discusses the challenges of applying metaanalysis to human dimensions research. Dealing with heterogeneity in meta analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. The opposite of heterogeneity is homogeneity meaning that all studies show the same effect. The randomeffects metaanalysis attempts to account for this distribution of effects and provides a more conservative estimate of the effect.
Hi all, i am using metal for meta analysis of some specific snps 6 snps of interest across three studies. This meta analysis evaluated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer including a total of 3781 patients with a cer 69%, rrr 9% and 24% heterogeneity reported by the meta analysis. Contents chapter 1 introduction 9 chapter 2 baseline risk as predictor of treatment benefit 17 chapter 3 advanced methods in metaanalysis. The software described in this manual is furnished under a license agreement or nondisclosure agreement. Heterogeneity is not something to be afraid of, it just means that there is variability in your data. This strategy effectively documents design heterogeneity, thus improving the practice of metaanalysis by aiding in. Meta analysis is a statistical method that combines quantitative findings from previous studies. This qualitative interview study aimed to understand researchers understanding of complexity and heterogeneity and the factors which may influence the choices researchers make in synthesising complex data. Statistical heterogeneity is the term given to differences in the effects of interventions and comes about because of clinical andor methodological differences between studies ie it is a consequence. Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta analysis, statistical software components s449201, boston college department of economics, revised 25 jan 2006. Software packages supporting clinical metaanalyses include the excel. In common with other meta analysis software, revman presents an estimate of the betweenstudy variance in a randomeffects meta analysis.
We searched databases medline, embase, cinahl, cochrane library, and consort, to. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the. Impact of multidrug resistant bacteria on economic and. Ideally, the studies whose results are being combined in the metaanalysis should all be undertaken in the same way and to the same experimental protocols. It has been almost 30 years since the publication of the first meta analysis of diagnostic test accuracy dta. M an aggregate statistic, to identify systematic heterogeneity patterns and their direction of effect in metaanalysis. Meta analysis is a statistical technique, or set of statistical techniques, for summarising the results of several studies into a single estimate.
1211 1508 395 1035 763 483 1209 20 613 1361 627 1533 532 98 403 298 1380 854 514 220 1458 831 665 1340 843 1237 782 1023 254 1181 209 899 867 1441